Sysop vandal point of view

From eg

The sysop vandal point of view is a systemic bias favouring sysop vandalism. The best and most ironic example of this bias is "that Wikipedia has removed the article on Sysop Vandalism (with the note "This page has been deleted, and should not be re-created without a good reason")." Agreeing with that removal is, effectively, adopting the SVPOV. A sysop vandal themselves probably also practices sysop vigilantism but this affects only one or a few wikis, while vandalism affects any that use wiki feeds or nest wikis or otherwise make use of open content.

The opposite of SVPOV, new troll point of view, has prevailed on troll-friendly wikis and most counterculture venues, according to smug pro-trolling trolls.

[edit] Proving you aren't one

You must demonstrate that you have abandoned SVPOV and other rationale for official vandalism, by reposting articles on sysop vigilantism (and the much more serious) sysop vandalism to Wikipedia and strongly defend them, arguing the "good reason" of over 500 hits on google. The term clearly spread despite Wikipedia's attempts to suppress and deny that their sysops engage in vandalism. This is particularly ironic since official vandalism covered in depth], with many examples of power structures not only approving of, but authorizing and planning, vandalism of opposing factions' works.